🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it appears it’s time for a rethink. As time has passed, an event that began as a celebration and reminder of history, culture and the connections between global Black communities, has developed a business-like atmosphere, growing to encompass gatherings where Black people are remunerated to talk to white audiences about implicit prejudice and “allyship”. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests created a surge in the business of demonstrating racial awareness. However, that period has concluded. The wave has crested, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what raising awareness is for.

The History of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with a week of commemoration and observance in the February's second week. Black History Month evolved from this initiative and was publicly established in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the North America in winter, but also in October in the UK, the Federal Republic of Germany, Éire and the Holland.

The month has transformed since those days, placing less emphasis on the histories of the slave trade across the Atlantic and struggles for equality, and greater focus on prominent Black figures in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and extensively acknowledging the contribution Black people have made to mold society. It is in schools where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the method the month is commemorated is a manifestation of the current political situation. How it develops is a valuable example in how assimilation leads to dismantling: the restructuring of Black History Month has hindered the purpose of it, which is to confront structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to reevaluate Black History Month more than the current time in which it occurs this year. In the Britain, a reemerging right-wing in the form of the Reform party is leading the polls. In the warmer months we observed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the UK's past. the Conservative leader, the Black leader of the Conservative party, is a strong critic of the racial justice movement, and we are in a place where a member of parliament feels emboldened to declare that the absence of Caucasian individuals in parts of a city is a reason for concern. Simultaneously, far-right parties are surging in the EU as a complete entity.

In the United States, a significant offensive against DEI and affirmative action has been taken, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the supreme judicial bodies of the nation. A drive to erase African American heritage and narrative from the historical documents is in progress. One of the former president's first executive orders targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the renowned cultural organization, alleging that they of a organized and extensive campaign to alter the country's historical narrative” by representing the nation “as naturally discriminatory”.

Against this backdrop, the observance illustrates how minimally it can be impactful if it is confined to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or politically neutered commemorations of contributions in the past, rather than addressing the realities of the current era. It also demonstrates how its restricted time span means that it is detached from the more extensive continuous action that is necessary. Denise Miller, a professor at a learning establishment, put it best when she raised concerns about the short-term symbolic gestures of the observance. “The problem with embracing a superficial method”, she stated, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month turns into a transient display rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden actions for racial equality and recognition in such times of discouragement and concern is a challenging endeavor. There is a temptation to just eliminate things like Black History Month completely, assuming they are inadequate for current needs, or are relics of an time that has failed to deliver.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and heritage of racial movements – community-based BLM initiatives, inclusion and equity efforts, and yes, even those talks to businesses – constitute an foundation that a significant effort has been dedicated to. It is there not only to deteriorate as the politics moves on (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is dispersed through the year (as some institutions are already beginning to do), parts of its content (particularly around historic Black characters) included in educational programs. It would also be a era that does not shy away from politics, and provides room for people, particularly young people, to air their fears and experiences. What purpose serves basic knowledge of the past when it ignores the current situation of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the street? Institutions who observe it should not be comforted with the passive language of “unconscious bias” and sensitivity to “microaggressions”, but challenged by the threats that impact society if fight against prejudice is not treated with importance. In short, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, critical, and adaptive. Maybe an total re-identification is necessary – Black History is Now Month.