🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive policy to restrict social networking access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves around the globe. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and families are monitoring with great interest to see if this strategy will set a precedent for other nations.

The European Trend

In Europe, a increasing chorus of nations are exploring comparable restrictions.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the leader declaring that mobile devices and apps are "taking away our kids' youth". A law may be enacted next year.
• The Norwegian government is planning to introduce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard young people from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is working on a digital wallet to confirm the age and identity of social media users. Authorities have indicated that an Australian-model ban is "one of the options under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has asked parliament to pass a bill raising the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has recommended a similar step, including an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The government in the Netherlands has recommended guardians to prevent their children from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has adopted a non-binding motion calling for a ban for minors except if guardian approval is granted. Even though it cautions of the "habit-forming" quality of these services, the step does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A clear age limit is a solid foundation," stated the MEP supporting the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Eye

In the UK, the government has not ruled out a potential ban, stating that "nothing is discarded" but maintaining any decision must be "grounded in conclusive research".

Earlier, support gathered behind a bill to enact controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually watered down. However, the administration vowed to investigate the matter.

Charities have expressed concerns. A prominent charity set up by the loved ones of a girl who died after encountering dangerous social media material suggests that a strict age ban could fail to improve online safety and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of harm when teens reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the failure of the tech sector to create tools that are appropriate and suitable for young users," said a prominent peer.

The US: A Decentralized Landscape

Stateside, legislation is largely occurring at the regional level against a backdrop of federal stalemate.

• Utah demands adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a law banning those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has passed a rule restricting teenagers to a single hour of social media time per day, with extra use dependent on a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise introduced measures requiring parental consent for minors to create social media accounts.

Despite cross-party agreement and suggestions from some individuals to copy Australia's example, a US-wide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Global Perspectives

Apart from Europe and the US, additional nations are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, global organizations adopt a more cautious stance. Unicef has cautioned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "could backfire". The body points out that social networks can be a "critical link" for isolated children and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to improve child safeguards.

Even as this worldwide conversation evolves, the policies of the Australian government and others demonstrate that policymakers internationally are increasingly prepared to stand by for the industry to self-regulate.